Search This Blog

Monday, November 24, 2025

WRITINGS, EVENTS, TRAINING



Books:

(2018) The Resurrection of Thinking: Steiner's Anthroposophy & the Postmodernism of Badiou, Deleuze, Derrida & Levinas






I am an anthroposophical researcher from Pennsylvania and a faculty member of the Global Event College, directed by Yeshayahu (Jesaiah) Ben-Aharon.

Current Research:


Spiritualizing the contents of Aristotle's philosophy in an anthroposophical sense, Philosophy of Mathematics, Anthroposophical Chemistry, Fridge Design, How to Create New Elements in the Earthly-Human Sun Through Community Processes


Youtube Video Demo


My Youtube Channel



One on one course offerings through Zoom: 

1.Spiritualization of Thinking. Occasionally I work with interested students on the spiritualization of thinking, using Steiner's philosophical works as a seed and living model. Contact me if you are interested in this. scottehicks@gmail.com 








Monday, April 1, 2024

Transformation of Psalm 98 through the New Impulse of the Second Coming and the Renewed Foundation Stone


O sing unto Christ a new song! 

For he has done marvelous things! 

His right hand and his holy arm have created, demonstrated, grasped, and achieved the victory of the new resurrection! 

The Lord has now made known again his salvation; through his uprightness, his goodness and love, 

He has openly shown his I AM in the sight of mere mortals and unbelievers. 

He has remembered his mercy and his truth toward all mankind. 

All the ends of the earth have seen the salvation of the resurrected and triumphant Christ! 

Make a joyful noise unto the Lord, our brother and friend, all of you on earth. 

Make a loud noise and rejoice and sing praise! 

Sing unto the Lord with the harp of our Spirit, with the cornet of our Soul, and the voice of our body. 

With the trumpet of our heart and the ringing chimes of our elevated thinking, 

Let us make a joyful music before the Lord, Christ Jesus, the Sun King. 

Let the sea roar and the fullness of the sea. Let all beings on the earth sound forth their love, 

And all that dwell there. Let the floods clap their hands! Let the hills be joyful together before the Lord. 

For he comes to renew the earth, to make it into an earthly-human Sun! 

With his upright I AM, shall he work with mankind to free the world,

To resurrect the people with balance, love, and mercy. 


[Written in the year of the rising of the new spiritual temple of the earthly human Sun] 




Thursday, July 13, 2023

Meditative Content to Awaken the Act of Pure Thinking outside the Physical Organism


                                                                        Painting by August Macke 



 1. Look at a plant, animal, or any object, such as the painting by Macke above. Perceive the external colors and forms clearly. Then set aside the perceptual content and focus on the idea or concept in your mind's eye. Note how you form the concept and how you are drawing on the canvas of your inner imagination. Stop drawing and focus on the forces that can draw. Orient your thinking activity toward the pure content, understanding, and meaning of the content, which comes from outside all of your powers. (Thank you to Rudolf Steiner and Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon) 


Now:  

Awaken self-conscious knowledge of what an idea actually is, and simultaneously create and experience a directly intuited or seen idea of the essence of self-conscious knowledge as a whole. Go from one to the other in a pulsing self-conscious thinking that is directly viewed, known, and understood. 


Guiding thoughts - What do all ideas have in common?  What is the idea of knowledge as a whole? See the idea of what knowledge is as a whole, while seeing the ground and beginning of your thinking activity. For more direction, follow Rudolf Steiner's Truth and Science


2. Prepare with an external plant, animal, or object as in #1.  Awaken intuition or what is the same: directly view the content of your thinking with insight into its pure meaning (without images). Now intuit or directly view the essence of your willed thinking in this moment. Simultaneously note the content of the idea that you are producing and understanding. Simultaneously also note the willed activity of your own act. 


Exactly what is my present thinking doing and where is it happening? Who is thinking? What am I understanding now? 


Conceive of many of the possible moves and faculties of the willful thinking activity as it moves in the realm of pure knowledge (understanding, essences, universals, ideas). 


Note that you create the moves from the thinking ground of the power of your own essence. You perceive this inwardly (without your senses), in your self-conscious I. This is filled with love and truth. 


Tip: Do this with a partner and follow and reflect their thinking in a neutral manner. (Thank you to Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon)


3. Start with the same preparation as in #1. Separate off the sense-perceptible content. Set aside the painting on your imagination canvas. Now: 

View the essence of the act of intuition from inside the essence of what is intuited. 

The essence of the plant, animal, or thing intuits the act and nature of intuition (directly seeing the content of self-conscious meaning without representational images) from the outside. But you can be both inside the act of intuition and inside the essence of the plant, etc. Make this consciousness a rhythmic pulse. 


4. Many people have trouble understanding what the philosophical concept of intellectual intuition means. Steiner describes it very clearly in the Philosophy of Freedom:  What perception is to colors and sound, intuition is to the content of thinking. In other words you use the powers of the senses to grasp the sense perceptible, like weight, smoothness, and the timbre of sounds, and lightness or darkness of hues. You use another organ to grasp the content and the present status of the meaning of your thinking. Memory images arise through percepts, but thoughts are not copies of externally existing objects. Rather the pure percept flow joins with a concept that you create. You then bring this together (instantly and usually unconsciously) in an personal idea or representation. However, the thinking eye-ball is the organ of intellectual intuition or seeing your ideas. But this is an understanding-reason-knowledge unfolding and awakening, not an 'after-image.' Eventually the student understands that this does not happen in the head, but beyond the physical organism, but it is reflected into the brain and nervous system, just as a real being is reflected into a mirror. 


The instant intuitive moment of grasping the meaning and content of a situation, in your thinking organ is like this: a blast of spiritual light or knowledge air, which brings the whole of the content instantly into your individual consciousness. It can then be organized into words through discourse, memory image and syntax. The truth of reality comes like a lightning strike in the shortest moment and can be so large in content that it can instantly be forgotten, if it is not brought down into consciousness. This bringing into my consciousness is a paralysis, freezing, and dying of the forces of the world from which the thinking content is coming. 








Saturday, April 15, 2023

From Lacanian Affects to Qualitative Spiritual Geometry

 


In her fine book 'Lacanian Affects,' Colette Soler writes the following: 


"Affects drift in the chain of signifiers, except for those that are not related to 

signifiers but rather to the unspeakable object; anguish is the first among the 

latter, insofar as it is moored to this object. But anguish is related to 

the temporality of the moments at which encounters occur, whereas 

the affective palette that is signified in everything the subject says is 

a constant of joui-sense. 

"On the contrary, the discordance of certain unpredictable affects – 

affects that are discordant with respect to discourse as well as to 

fantasy, and that inevitably surprise the subject himself – turns out 

to have a different origin, these affects originating in knowledge of 

lalangue that will forever be unknown." p 106 


This approach may be confusing to people who are not acquainted with Lacanian analysis and post-modern philosophy and so on, but the idea is as follows:  We have certain emotional and psychological disturbances, symptoms, and problems of our character and/or our inner nature that we cannot solve so easily by superficial methods like going to the gym, just talking to a counselor, re-arranging our house, journaling, even meditating. Coming from a Freudian tradition, Lacan (see his excellent 'Four Fundamental Concepts') and his students like Soler, have uncovered the phenomena showing that the source of these psychological problems lie in an unconscious region that is not easily or directly accessible to rational and wide-awake self-conscious penetration. But the unconscious elements which are at least partly at the source of our deep-rooted psychological problems and the pain, fear, distress, and so on that accompanies them, CAN come to consciousness in a symbolic way, or in a linguistic way that can be understood by the rational mind to a certain degree and can provide clues for healing. But right at the source of these symbolic or linguistically arranged elements, there is a black hole or a primordial aspect that escapes consciousness. Yet, because it lies right in the doorway of the unconscious spring, it is hanging around in the background of every psychological aspect that comes to light.  Lacan has a lot of fun ways of trying to describe its nature by showing how it is embedded in the playful origins and creative etymological elements of language itself. He calls the function of this productive black hole, or this unknown actor that hangs around backstage, the object little a - or objet petit a.  The emotional or 'affective' partner of this black hole is jouissance or orgasmic enjoyment, which also can transform into depression and pain. Soler's point here is that the feeling or affect of anguish seems to be directly connected to this unknown director or actor hanging out behind the curtains in the black hole of our psyche. So the riddles of enigmas of such deep feelings (which are structured in a psychological-symbolic language or lalangue - the French word for tongue or language). Joui-sense is the fun linguistic way of pointing to how there is a play of meaning or sense that arises through the enjoyment and pain that is attached to our psychological and character difficulties or fetishes, and so on. In French there is such a strong connection between the notion of sensing or smelling something with our body and creating meaning or knowledge in consciousness through thinking. 



We can make a transition to spiritual scientific research, analysis, and experience by extending Soler and Lacan in a new direction. For it is truly the case that the affective part of the soul connected to lust, desire, pleasure, animal sensation, and smell has its relations to the mineral body and also to the images in the etheric body, and the way that thinking and its linguistic correlates are organized rationally or irrationally in the etheric body and nervous and lymphatic systems. 



Now the difference is that one who is developing Imaginative consciousness in the anthroposophical manner can begin to see with spiritual organs in a clear fashion what is happening behind the surface of what Lacanian analyses are uncovering. You can see that Soler and Lacan still set up a kind of Kantian limit of consciousness and knowledge - they say that there are some things that cannot be accurately conceptualized or grasped in clear thinking. But following Rudolf Steiner's indications and our experience we want to use pure thinking (without images and outside the subjective pictures in the head) to grasp any phenomenon, whether mineral, representational, psychological, or spiritual (See Rudolf Steiner's "Truth and Knowledge" for more on this).  Because the world connects to the life that is at the center of thinking, we can meet the essence of the world in pure thinking.  In this I find myself in a center of the world's activities. 



But the fine clue given in Soler is the emotion of anguish. We can follow the existential anguish that we find in ourselves at the border of knowledge, and painful self-knowledge, when we look at ourselves like a stranger. Tolstoy's fictional writings are great teachers of such an honest self-examination, by the way. I experience that I am partly a mature and serious spiritual researcher who has truly grown, but also one who has elements of animalistic, chaotic, selfish, aggressive tendencies in myself that are very hard to change. I am only partly human at this point. This split in my soul, my life, my hopes and my self - instead of depressing me too much - can instead lead one beyond one's own personal or character troubles. The anguish gives me a thread to the unseen other. To remain truthful, we can follow this thread into my own memory fields. These memory fields are also connected to the historical events in the earth - so I can follow their light and life beyond my own lifetime into the center of the 20th century. This can lead us to the Event of the 20th century, described by Ben-Aharon in his first book. I see and feel connected to the fact that the potential of the highest spiritual development, gentleness, wisdom, and goodness is shining into the human project, but I also see that the most evil and demonic elements are also trying to create an anti-human - the most cunning animal who uses machines for selfish purposes. In spiritual-historic reality, the greatest light was shining into the spiritual worlds while below people were murdering each other with vast machines in the most barbaric way. In reality, all humans are connected spiritually throughout history, therefore I am also morally and karmically connected to this 'past' historical fact. 



But in being connected to things larger than my personality, I am also healthily woven into the various rhythms of the world: in breath and out breath, the pulse of my heart, day and night, warming and cooling, the rotation of the moon, eclipses, comets, asteroids, planetary rotation, the stars moving ever so slowly, the turning of the earth, the seasons, the work and growth of people, animals, plants, life and death, etc. And not in an abstract sense - I am directly and minutely connected to just this particular plant, to just this way that the sun shines at dawn on my little house, to just my community, to this turkey in my backyard at this hour. This must be kept in the highest aristotelian and scientific precision of individualities. And there are specific spiritual and elemental beings who are connected with each hour, location, season, type of animal, stone, plant, folk. 

These world-rhythms can be quantitatively understood - the patterns can be expressed by numbers. In the soul world, I am woven out of living rhythms, or numbers, a geometry of soul life. We can paraphrase Rudolf Steiner in this way. The zodiacal life that is unique can show up in the images and linguistic elements that arise in a symbolic way during psychological analysis. And I am connected to the Spirit-Word that does indeed weave my Spiritual Nature out of the Highest Christ-like element beyond the Angels and Zodiacal Beings. In this way, we see that Lacan's linguistic healing games are a much lower reflection of this living Word activity. 



The inner gestures of my heart as a spiritual organ produce an Imaginative landscape in devotional and reverential knowledge, that is connected with a thinking that is awake to its spiritual life in the world (outside the head). This gives rise to new concepts and ideas (and not merely to visions and feelings of ecstasy inside the mind's eye). I gently open the black hole at the center of my existence to Christ and in powerlessness but hope ask that His Spirit may fill and transform me. In this resurrected heart-thinking, Michael works with Christ's growing appearance, as Ben-Aharon writes in his recent books, such as The Three Meetings



In such an experience, one can see, feel, and experience that any twelvefold experience in the heart is not just made up of geometrical lines or visions of transcendent geometry, but rather one is pulsing in a moral world, made up of the highest sensitivity of beauty, gentleness, humaneness, and love. Thus what could be called a Qualitative Geometry of Schiller's highest hopes can arise - an artform that he is searching for in his Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Mankind. I am living in a eurhythmic group expression of gesture in an art of creating concepts of my I AM. My imageless meaning life arising through intuitive thinking then can become world-wide colored Imaginations, like on the ceiling of the Goetheanums. Each side of this heart-human dodecahedron is simultaneously a doorway to the inside-out. Each edge of each side is a different color, mood, sound. Some are more rounded, some are more narrow. I do not have to stop at the mere 3-dimensional geometrical representation of a pentagonal dodecahedron, as I lower it into my heart, following Rudolf Steiner's acts of the laying of the Foundation Stone. Instead the rich, colored, singing life of the spiritual worlds speaks into my heart in a new language, and gives me the impetus to grow, grow, grow!  


For more on these issues, you can find my books here






 





via GIPHY

Sunday, April 2, 2023

Developing the Ramacharaka I AM Mantra one Step Further, following Spiritual Scientific Practice

 




Atkinson or Ramacharaka developed an important mantra in his book on RAJA YOGA. His work is a fine place to start, because he emphasizes the creation of a fiercely independent consciousness of the power of the I AM right from the start. The mantra is this: 

I AM a center, around me revolves my world. 

I AM a center of thought and consciousness. 

I AM a center of influence and power. 

I AM independent of the body. 

I AM immortal and cannot be destroyed. 

I AM invincible and cannot be injured. 

I AM. I AM. I AM. 




Now, eventually in spiritual development following the anthroposophical path, you will have to come to terms with the fact that the I AM you have developed so faithfully in your soul through work on your individuality or through concentrations on mantras like the above (a totally safe and correct beginning point, nevertheless) remains a subjective and personal power in your soul and has not yet crossed the threshold to become a Spiritual I AM, or the beginning of the impersonal Spirit-Self, nourished and created by the Lord. To work on this spiritual scientific path, one can alter the mantra above in the following way, by adding in elements directly from Steiner and our own work: 



I AM a center, around me revolves the world. 

I AM the whole world and the whole world lives in me. 

Yet, not merely I but Christ in me. For the Spirit created my I AM. Out of the Godhead we are born. 

I become free through my own activity, but I AM devoted to God, the Spirits, and the Event who wills my life. 

We work together in the Spirit, the Soul World, and on Earth. 

Through the guidance of the Masters of Wisdom and Harmony of Life, Soul, and Spiritual Sensations. 

--- 

I AM a center of thinking, consciousness, and attention. 

I AM the creator of my own thinking in free morality, when I intuit the essences of objects in the ideal world. Here there are no personal images. Here only truth reigns.  

I AM thinking in the spirits of the world, the spirits of the world are the essence of the thoughts in me. 

I stretch out my life in influence and power, but also wide-awake receptivity and reverence to the spirit of life. I am inspired by Beauty. She feels in me. 

It weaves me. I am grateful that the Spirit weaves me, as I find myself powerless in the Event. Only HE and SHE can save me from my soul death. 

My heart is a center of love and harmony, in the spirit of my blood. 

In Christ, we die. 

But in Christ, death becomes life. 

----

I AM alive in my earthly bodies, but I AM independent of them and they will dissolve at my death. 

Both death and life are my friends. 

I AM immortal and cannot be destroyed, yet it is only because Christ preserves my freedom in His GREAT I AM. 

We are resurrected through the Holy Spirit. 

I revere the Father as It works and wills me. 

In Christ, I AM invincible and cannot be destroyed. 

I stand in the power of the black cross with seven red roses. 

Thou Art and I stand in the eternal Flame of the I AM. 

I AM. I AM. I AM. 


---






Saturday, April 1, 2023

Brentano's Tennis Match or a Modern Spiritual Scientific Rhythmic Practice of Giving and Receiving

 



In 'Riddles of the Soul', Rudolf Steiner carefully investigates the essential character of Franz Brentano's descriptive psychology. The fundamental thesis that developed out of Brentano's half-conscious experience was that what is of an inner, soul, or psychological nature was always characterized by consciousness or awareness of something. I am worried about my mother, I am listening to the music, etc. This basic discovery led Husserl to develop modern phenomenology. But Rudolf Steiner, wanting to subtly and carefully provide an extension into the realm of objectivity or reality, adds an extra feature to such a descriptive psychology. He notes that what is 'physical' always arises through its relation to something else: for example, the copper changes color after being exposed to oxygen, the mushroom when cut changes color, the windchimes changed their tune when blown by this particular breeze, the color of my wife's face changes according to the sun exposure, etc. If we wish to develop this into a fully modern spiritual scientific practice, we can follow through this whole process of inward and outward sensing from pole to pole, like a fun game of playing tennis in your awareness. We first start with an element of what arises from and is transformed by something else, like balls of oil moving in a lava lamp, or wind moving leaves on a tree, or colors cast by a prism on a wall in the flux of cloud cover. Then we move from the 'physical' phenomena to the attentiveness on the inner fact that I am aware of this fluctuating element which arises from something else. Now the problem is that you may well be caught in a Kantian illusion that all phenomena, whether psychical or physical are still subjective. Both Brentano and Steiner provide different escape routes from this illusion, for example, through following the will impulse that is related to the judgement that this color exists, that the lamp exists, that the tree exists. For Brentano and Steiner, a judgment of the existence, or the truth inherent in the essence of something lies outside the subjective bubble. But can you experience it? Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon has shown us the value of pursuing new forms of dialectical or cognitive yogic practices, which are part of the modern path of consciousness-soul development under the Michaelic influence of our time. 

Mantra: 

Consciousness becomes aware of what is transformed from outside itself. What is transformed by what is beyond itself, becomes conscious of itself. Follow the transition from one to the other. Create a new middle transition zone. I AM. 


via GIPHY

Monday, September 19, 2022

Review of "The Three Meetings: Christ, Michael, and Anthroposophia" by Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon (2022)



                                                              


In 1975, Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon had a life-changing spiritual experience of meeting Christ face-to-face.  He is not the only one to have experienced this meeting in the 20th century, but what is extraordinary and original about his life and writing, is that he didn’t stop there. Instead, he has worked with this graceful Event for decades and enhanced his understanding and self-consciousness through Anthroposophical study to research what happened and exactly how it happened and how to return to this ever-present spiritual Event. He turned the living instruments found behind the pages of Rudolf Steiner’s books into faculties in order to work with this etheric Second Coming, this new appearance of the Christ again and again as his daily, individual self-conscious achievement. In The Three Meetings, Dr. Ben-Aharon puts it this way: “When the given meeting is transformed into the voluntary meeting, we realize that the copy of Christ’s ‘I’ that we receive and individualize consciously, was contained in the being of the Christ that we experienced in the first meeting...Then we discover, in the light of spiritual knowledge, radiating from the Holy Grail, that the Christ Himself is the source of the copies of His ‘I’.” (p. 5)   Steiner laid out a vast laboratory of tools in his unparalleled philosophical and spiritual scientific writings, including his understanding of the nature of the Second Coming from direct experience as an initiate of the highest caliber. Steiner died in 1925, but actually his books are still the most relevant, potent and youthful on earth. The seeds and faculties given by Christ to Ben-Aharon in the first meeting were joined to the new faculties that were developed through Anthroposophy, so that a new form of human and spiritual co-working could arise: a new Imaginative-Spiritual Scientific Knowledge or a marriage of Anthroposophia and Christ. Beginning with the spiritualization of thinking and not elsewhere, Dr. Ben-Aharon developed the blueprint for these new kinds of faculties which now can be achieved by any human being sooner or later, if they take up the difficult task of anthroposophical self-development (“This means that in our age, through the etheric Second Coming, it becomes possible for more and more people to prepare themselves to receive the Ego-copy of the Christ.”, p. 6). A new rigorously scientific etheric clairvoyance, developed under the guidance of Christ as a friend, has now developed. Ben-Aharon published the first results of his detailed methods and research in the 1990s in two books: The Spiritual Event of the 20th Century (1993) and The New Experience of the Supersensible (1995).  

The content of his newest book, The Three Meetings (2022, Temple Lodge), started as an expansion and rewriting of the introduction (about the first 20 pages) of Dr. Ben-Aharon’s The New Experience of the Supersensible. Ben-Aharon is currently finishing up his huge 4 volume expansion of this masterpiece, and The Three Meetings opens a doorway and shines a light onto what is soon to come. Although this new text does provide a preface to that larger work in a greatly expanded form (The Three Meetings is around 140 pages), and gives an overview of the whole of Ben-Aharon’s life’s work regarding the joining of Anthroposophy and the new Christ Event, The Three Meetings can also stand alone. It is self-sufficient, because it is also connected to the living spiritual substance that lies behind the words of the text, which the attentive reader can also enter, if one studies the text with one’s whole soul. In that sense, this book is an extremely precious and rare gift to the world, filled with sparks of life that can change one’s whole approach to modern spiritual development. Furthermore, such a deep reading can allow the student to begin her own path toward the free experience, testing, and verification of the spiritual content itself. This may take many years, but patient study and reflection will be rewarded. The book is filled from its very spiritual core with the spiritual impulse of freedom and the development of modern and clear self-consciousness and the strengthening of the sense of I AM. 

The text describes how the meeting of the Christ can lead to a meeting with the leading spirit of our time, Michael, and also to the living being of Anthroposophia as a person. The text is not primarily concerned with outlining visionary experience, speculative assessments, or abstract intellectual judgments. Instead, spiritual scientific concepts and clear thinking become windows through the world, which when joined with the knowledge faculties awakening in the spiritual heart, and the intuitive knowledge of the etheric Self, lead one into world-wide Imaginative spiritual pictures beyond the idea of the physical body. This knowledge has unfolded above all through painful self-knowledge and moral development and co-working with the spiritual world itself. The book is a conversation in the deepest sense and an unfolding of Anthroposophy 2.0 and we could also say, Christianity 2.0. 

      The book is divided into eight chapters, which discuss the Pauline method, the development of the new Cognitive Yoga, crossing the Threshold, and meeting the three great spirits mentioned in the title. It also discusses how one has to wrestle with and change the faculty of knowledge when encountering the spiritual world and the Second Coming, and how an anthroposophical bridge can be built to and from the spiritual world and the etheric Christ. The book is full of spiritual research that we have never encountered before (that was not present in the original short outline in the 90s, nor in his other books) but is it firmly based on Rudolf Steiner’s research. In fact, Ben-Aharon explicitly quotes and refers to around 60 different volumes of Steiner’s collected works in this book of modest length. He knows Rudolf Steiner’s work better than anyone I have ever studied or encountered, but it is not just a matter of academic knowledge. Rather the living seeds in Steiner’s work have been grown and developed in Ben-Aharon’s own life and have sprouted in new ways, since these seeds have been nourished with the world-changing pulses coming from the Christ Event in the world of formative forces. A case in point: he has taken one small section from Steiner’s Truth and Science (GA 3), and has expanded it into a complete exercise to prepare oneself for entering the spiritual world. What was merely hinted at in the introduction to The New Experience of the Supersensible is now rounded out into a carefully explained exercise for noting and separating the influence of the 4 bodies (physical, etheric, astral, and ego) on our experience of the world. It is still a difficult exercise! But we now have another blueprint to help us to develop the new faculties of the Michaelic age, based on spiritualizing thinking and perception, rather than falling back onto older and easier practices. 

      Let us now turn to the some of the details given in this book. In chapter 1, we find that Paul’s meeting with the Christ supersensibly on the road to Damascus contains the essence of what can be experienced today in our meeting with the Etheric Christ. Such a Pauline method consists of seeing and experiencing Christ’s lifetime as an imaginative wholeness, and simultaneously perceiving how the forces of death in oneself are transformed through Christ’s spiritual life. “Overcoming the death forces inherent in the modern ahrimanic intellect is indeed the starting point for the knowledge drama of the Second Coming...and the source of the forces of resurrection...is found in the appearance, words, and deeds of the etheric Christ.” (p. 10). Rudolf Steiner showed that Krishna, the sublime being who gave the original impulses for the ancient Yoga, was also present in the incarnation of Jesus, and that through his incarnation, yoga and the essence of the Bhagavad-Gita were raised to a higher development and given to all humanity. Krishna’s light shined onto Paul and the light of Krishna shines from the etheric Christ today. Ben-Aharon’s Cognitive or Michaelic Yoga (see his book from 2016) was developed through the wedding of Anthroposophy and the Etheric Christ Event. “This means that the source of the modern form of yoga, in its anthroposophical-Michaelic form described by Rudolf Steiner in 1919-20...is the etheric appearance of the Christ, because in this experience one becomes part of this new etheric breathing with one’s etheric body...through the etherization of thinking and sense-perception, as described...in Cognitive Yoga.” This luminous pulse of knowledge gave birth to the esoteric instruction created by the student of Paul, Dionysius the Areopagite, in ancient Athens, where the ‘inhalation’ and ‘exhalation’ of life and death, and being and nothingness led to a living experience at the point of their crossing. This new yoga impulse was the source of both negative theology and the ancient Greek dialectic of its greatest philosophers. Dialectic, a rhythmic process of reaching true knowledge by separating and combining elements of reality, and awakening original memory to perceive the Ideas, lies at the essence of accessing truth in Plato’s Dialogues – it is a process to ‘carve reality at the joints’ (Phaedrus). This spiritual intuitive process is dampened down into a more modern logical process emphasizing the connection of sense-experience with strict scientific principles, genera, and categories in Aristotle’s works. The complete elaboration of every possibility of thinking activity was given in Aristotle’s works, which in turned influenced all of Western thought until the 15th century.  Plato’s intuitive knowledge was combined inwardly with the development of Christianity during the same time period.  

      Therefore, one of the primary tasks for the end of the 20th century, which Ben-Aharon primarily contributed to, was to resurrect and transform what had become dead in modern intellectual processes and in anthroposophy and merge it with a renewed and enlivened dialectical or yogic process linked to the ancient Greek philosophical worldviews or streams. “Both streams could only be spiritualized through the meeting with the etheric Christ, because only this source of wholly new spiritual forces could bring both to Imaginative consciousness. Building on this foundation, one could use this united spiritual force to create the knowledge drama of the Second Coming and build the foundations for the new School of Michael in the twenty-first century. As Aristotle had to kill the divine method of Plato, and transform it into earthly logical thinking, Rudolf Steiner’s karmic task was to resurrect this dead dialectic and create modern spiritual science out of it. In the way he grasps the living essence of the Dialectic, we can find the seed of its resurrection through the etheric Christ impulse and the Michaelic Yoga.” (p. 19)  We see what potential is truly available in the deepest esoteric sense, for anthroposophical forward development and for human evolution. Even though this light shines from the spiritual world closest to us, the Etheric Christ and living Anthroposophia are, unfortunately, almost totally unperceived today, even by those who profess to be interested in the spiritual path and Steiner’s contributions. But Michael’s rhythmic pulse is active everywhere. 

In chapter 2, the essence of this new cognitive or Michaelic yoga is described, where one spiritualizes thinking according to the pathways of The Philosophy of Freedom, and spiritualizes all of our external senses through an anthroposophical deepening of Goethe’s natural scientific power of observation and sense-perception. Through Christ’s new impulses flowing into the middle of their crossing point, one can develop such a new dialectic, yogic, or rhythmic spiritual scientific practice of mutual essence exchange with the spiritual world. “Only by means of this practice can we find the truly modern way to the most important event in the evolution of humanity and the earth in our age: the new appearance of the Christ in the etheric world. Only in this way can we illuminate His etheric appearance with the resurrected light of Michael’s intelligence and thinking.” (p. 27) 

In chapter 3, we find an inspiring description of a new type of spiritual development and an outlining of a new knowledge process which is totally unique in anthroposophical literature: how Dr. Ben-Aharon transformed his first meeting into a voluntary meeting with the Christ impulse through a combination of the forces lying behind Rudolf Steiner’s works, The Philosophy of Freedom on one pole, and The Riddles of the Soul, on the other. This concerns what it means to build a bridge from everyday consciousness up to the spiritual world on one side, and from the other side, to consciously devitalize spiritual experiences outside the body, in order to build a bridge back to the brain and body from the etheric world downwards. This chapter, “The Platonic-Aristotelian Essence Exchange at the End of the Twentieth Century” is outlined in the context of a mutual enlivening of the worldviews and spiritual influences flowing broadly from Aristotle and Plato; what was described in terms of the new Michaelic plan in Ben-Aharon’s The Twilight and Resurrection of Humanity, is concentrated into one human experience here. He describes his struggles in his mid-30s (after a decade of anthroposophical work with the original 1975 given experience, focused primarily on the Philosophy of Freedom pole): “The spiritualized thinking that I used to bring my Imaginative perception to fully conscious supersensible cognition, was not flowing from the etheric to the physical world and back to the etheric world; it remained active in the etheric body in the etheric world; and I couldn’t bring my imaginative faculties to penetrate the physical brain and transform its intellectual forces from within...This must be distinguished from the ability to work from above into the etheric body, because in this way, one reaches down only so far as to imprint in the etheric body the etheric correlates of the spiritual experiences that one investigates...Therefore, the problem that I faced was...how to bring down the living imaginative forces and condense them to...become a force of cognition inside the physical body.” (p. 40)  At this moment, he came to study The Riddles of the Soul, which gave him the impetus to finally condense these Imaginative experiences in an Aristotelian way down into the physical body itself. “I found out that, paradoxically, when this ahrimanic force that causes the killing of spiritual perception and its paralysis...is spiritualized, it has the opposite effect. It saturated the original imaginative perception with inspired and intuited forces, from which the bridge could receive its necessary solid etheric forces and substances. An enhanced imaginative faculty was the result.” (p. 53). This process is described in great detail in the text.  

       In chapter 4, he writes about the ever-changing process of meeting the Christ in the etheric world:   


“There is absolutely no fixed and separated being in this stream of perpetual becoming. And if this is true for each single being and process, we must realize to what extent this applies to the appearance, words, and deeds of the etheric Christ. He appears as the cosmic heart centre and life fountain of the world of etheric becoming; He is the being of infinite becoming; His etheric appearance, words and deeds consist of perpetual actualization of metamorphosis, transformation, change and growth. And this is the spiritual essence of the ‘I’ that He gives us. Therefore, if we want to investigate this experience and recapitulate it voluntarily, we must become His becoming, in a conscious way. The threefold spiritual meeting with the Christ: His imaginative appearance, inspirative words and intuitive deeds, not only demonstrate the objective becoming process of humanity and the earth, but His ‘I’ demonstrates it through and inside our ‘I’. He is therefore the supreme teacher of the mutual human world becoming in our universe. This means that our spiritualized cognitive activity is not taking place outside the being that we know, but inside this being, and our cognition is spiritualized by means of the force of spiritual becoming that flows from this being, the etheric Christ.” (p 66)


     In Chapter 5, “The Abyss and the Event of the Threshold” we learn how to become conscious of, separate, and voluntarily erase elements of our everyday experience in order to approach the chasm between sense experience and the true spiritual world in a prepared, balanced, and fully modern way. Then, if we can hold onto our faith and trust in the goodness of the spiritual world, IT may, when it wishes, resurrect us into true spiritual consciousness. This systematic and moral approach is developed, as mentioned above, from Rudolf Steiner’s Truth and Science. Ben-Aharon writes, “Now we must feel the reality of the corpse of thinking intensively. We must feel how our personal identity crystallizes around this memorized, habitual, dead soul content...We begin to experience that, by means of the sum-total of the mental pictures that man has engraved in his soul during earthly life, he becomes a free being on earth, but has also died to the spiritual world.” (p 74) ...“Then man can be granted the modern Pauline Christ experience: Not ‘I’ (in so far as this ‘I’ is embodied in the contents of earthly consciousness), but my Self is active, therefore I AM. This becomes our new situation and event meditation. This meeting and essence exchange between the ‘I’ of Christ and the human ‘I’, becomes thus the living centre of the knowledge drama of the Second Coming. This experience constitutes a new ground of the groundless, self-less, self-conscious spiritual becoming at the Threshold. But only through the repeated practice of the living annihilation of all soul contents and habits, does man develop the power that gradually cracks the hardened shell of his enclosing mental egg. And it is out of this hardened enclosure that the ‘wings of passage’ are released in due course, carrying him over the grey and dark-gloomy abyss into the luminous spirit land in which the etheric Christ appears. When we practice this spiritual activity, we feel how the dead forces of the Mind Soul die out, and the youthful and vibrant forces of the Consciousness Soul emerge and flourish.” (p 75)  

We find in chapter 5 that when our Michaelic Yoga practice is developed far enough, the spiritualized thinking pole penetrates to the origin of Imaginative perception, and perception joins the essence of spiritual thinking – there in this middle or twilight zone, the night awareness and the day  awareness can unite into a single spiritually awake consciousness. In addition, Dr. Ben-Aharon gives us a clear indication of how J.G. Fichte’s true spiritual experience of the I AM, can also be our center point for entering pure thinking and spiritual scientific Imagination. 

The later chapters of The Three Meetings describe deep esoteric details about meeting with the Christ, Michael, and Anthroposophia from direct experience. The words written in the text are life-changing, but must also be handled with the deepest responsibility because they operate from the direct source of the Mysteries. For this reason, those elements are not covered in the context of a public book review. 

But, what a book! We can truly celebrate with the greatest joy that a bridge-builder is incarnated on earth today, who maintains a clear connection to the living being of Anthroposophia, Michael, and Christ. Through his books and his schooling, Dr. Ben-Aharon is helping us to develop in the clearest and most up-to-date manner possible. The Three Meetings does not resort to symbolic language, mere emotional enthusiasm or preaching. He instead works intensely with the most difficult elements of cognition and spiritual scientific knowledge, and untangles spiritual and soul encounters that are shockingly turbulent – but putting it forward in a concise manner so that the anthroposophical student of the 21st century can do his or her best to study it and progress, no matter how difficult or intense the real spiritual essence is in reality. His works do come out of his own life, but they do not really only concern him personally. Ben-Aharon is a human, learning how to grow with all the rest of us. His books give the reader a universal human spark, and not only a personal myth. Steiner and Ben-Aharon have taught us that we must grapple with the deepest forces of cognition in approaching the door of spirit. I know this intimately from my own work in this direction. From my own modest development in spiritual science as demonstrated in my recent books, I can confirm that what Ben-Aharon writes comes from legitimate spiritual development in the Anthroposophical sense and is directly connected with Rudolf Steiner’s continued work and the living work of the spiritual beings that are mentioned in the title of this work. Let each person calmly dig out his and her hidden serpents of criticism, in the way elaborated in Knowledge of the Higher Worlds and Its Attainment, and instead locate the open door! Let the truth be heard by those who have opened the ears of the heart! Let people gently gather around the light when it appears and let this spiritual light be magnified through both study and faith! The Second Coming is a present reality, and Rudolf Steiner’s continued work is a present reality – now let each one of us rise to the occasion and let our tasks also become a present and living spiritual reality, linked to Christ’s true light and true gift. Humanity can and must do this TOGETHER. 


Scott Elliot Hicks, author of The Resurrection of Thinking (2018) and Earthly, Transcendental & Spiritual Logic (2019).   

Friday, September 2, 2022

Medieval Philosophy and the Active Intellect - the Connection with Astronomy and Spiritual Science

     


                                                                            Scott E. Hicks 2023






 Davidson wrote the following in his excellent book on Averroes, Avicenna, and Alfarabi: 


"In the medieval Aristotelian universe, a series of incorporeal intelligences parallels the series of celestial spheres, the transparent spherical bodies that carry the planets and stars around the Earth. In the version of the Aristotelian scheme of the universe endorsed by Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, the active intellect, the factor leading the potential human intellect to actuality, is added as a final link to the chain of intelligences. It therein parallels the sublunar world, which stands as the last and least cosmic body, at the end of the series of celestial spheres." (p. 13) 


     We can connect our contemporary spiritual scientific worldview with this older cosmic schema, in the following way: the I AM is now able to self-consciously think and see its thinking both on Earth and in the sublunar world, which is now becoming visible through our Imagination that can see the Etheric. This is now available because of the Etheric appearance of the Christ Being, which began in 1933. The teaching that we have received from Rudolf Steiner enables us to interpret Aristotle's statement from his the Generation of Animals that our thinking capacity and reason is a divine element that enters into the soul from outside of it, namely from the Spirit proper. The etheric world is the first world that we can now enter, when we have enlivened our thinking, our morality, and our imagination through anthroposophy and the Christ Impulse. 


     Thinking penetrates into all parts of the corporeal body of the human being, but also exists in its supersensible elements outside the body, linking up with the celestial living spheres in a way that can now arise in our consciousness in a healthy manner. In this way, the Michaelic mission begins to take on form, because thinking is lifted up once again into the celestial spheres, but now having taken the extract from mineralized thinking, death, clarity, and earthly science and having woven this together with the strong sense of Ego that has arisen through perception in our earthly incarnation. Through the spiritualized memory substance, and the spiritualization of our sense of I and our thinking, we can now become conscious in our superlunary extensions. 


     In addition, Alfarabi speaks from experience of the fact that in the same way that the sun creates the light which permits vision to take place, "an emission from the active intellect...illumines the human material intellect." (p. 50 in Davidson)  Today, through the inspiration we have received from Ben-Aharon and Rudolf Steiner, we can take the illumination from the world-mind as it thinks in me, and bring it down into the cold grave of the brain, feeling its powers becoming icy and dead. But we use the warmth of the original inspiration from my Spiritual Self, to pull its energy down into the heart and there to wage the battle in the heart discussed by Ben-Aharon in Chapter 5 of The Modern Christ Experience and the Knowledge Drama of the Second Coming (Expanded edition of New Experience of the Supersensible). Here we take what is true in materialism, what is healthy in perception, and what is solid in the creation of our I AM, and we work with devotion and also wait with patience for "a connection with a matter different from and more divine that the so-called elements" to appear (Aristotle, Generation of Animals 736b30). This quintessence is the bridge that can become now a self-conscious "resonant chamber" (I borrow this from Torbjorn Eftestol's work on Deleuze and music) and a living garden of lights in which we pray to open our self-consciousness with full awareness to the knowledge process as a whole to appear as new heavens and new earth. Let us also follow Christ and build this bridge of knowing and actively-seen-thinking down into the sub-earthly - to spiritualize fallen matter, electric and symbolic logic, tech and the immoral egotism living in us and in our bodies, minds, souls, and spirits. 

     Alfarabi says that "the rational part of the soul is very similar to the incorporeal beings" and the "soul joins the company of incorporeal beings." For the soul has become "free of matter", can "dispense with matter", and no longer "requires matter for its existence." Since immortality means simply the ability to exist independently of a body, immortality is thus a concomitant of the stage of acquired intellect. The soul liberates itself from matter even before the body dies and "remains in that state perpetually, its eudaemonia (blessedness or theoretical bliss) being complete." (Davidson p. 56) 


'The imagination, Alfarabi explains, is a faculty of the soul located in the heart and standing immediately below, and serving, the rational faculty. It stores sense perceptions, or the impressions of sense perceptions, when the objects of perception are no longer present. It manipulates sense perceptions, disassembling them or combining them into configurations...It can create figurative images...that symbolize, rather than strictly represent, a given object.' (D, p. 58) 


He also said that imagination can lead to clairvoyance in divine matters, where the imaginative faculty 'sees figurative images of incorporeal intelligible beings and other supernal beings.' The active intellect (nous poetikos) gives the imaginative faculty, and the imaginative faculty receives and sees figurative images of the incorporeal intelligible beings and other supernal substances. (p 59-60 D) For Alfarabi, the active intellect emanates from the First Cause. 


    For Avicenna, memory provides a gateway to understanding the nature of the active intellect. Sense perceptible contents can be stored at least partly in the body. But intelligible contents, which are concepts, are indivisible and therefore cannot be stored in the body. He says that the active intellect emanates such concepts down into the soul, where the soul can remember their thought content.  


    About Avicenna, Rudolf Steiner makes the following points: 

"Through Avicenna and Averroes, something was introduced that was to enter human civilization with the beginning of the fifteenth century, namely, the struggle for the consciousness soul. After all, the Greeks had only attained to the intellectual or rational soul. What Avicenna and Averroes brought across, what Aristotelianism had turned into in Asia, so to speak, struggles with the comprehension of the human I, which, in a completely different way, has to struggle upward through the Germanic tribes from below to above...In Asia, on the other hand, the I was received like a revelation from above as a mystery wisdom. This gave rise to the view that for so long provoked such weighty disputes in Europe, namely, that man's ego is not actually an independent entity but is basically one with the divine universal being. The aim was to take hold of the ego. The I was supposed to be contained in what the Greek beheld as the being of body, soul, and spirit.


"Yet, people could not harmonize the above with the I. This is the reason for Avicenna's conception that what constitutes the individual soul originates with birth and ends with death. As we have seen, the Greeks struggled with this idea. The Egyptians viewed it only in this way — the individual soul is enkindled at birth, extinguished at death. People were still wrestling with this conception when they considered the actual soul element between birth and death, the true soul element. The I, on the other hand, could not be transitory in this manner. Therefore, Avicenna said: Actually, the ego is the same in all human beings. It is basically a ray from the Godhead which returns again into the Godhead when the human being dies. It is real, but not individually real. A pneumatic pantheism came about, as if the ego had no independent existence but was only a ray of the deity streaming between birth and death into what the Greeks viewed as the soul-spiritual nature. In a manner of speaking, the transitory soul element of man is ensouled with the eternal element through the ray of the Godhead between birth and death. This is how people imagined it." (GA 204) 


    But now the situation is totally different, and can be transformed more and more deeply, the more we individually develop self-consciousness, love of inner freedom, and our sense of an I AM who is independent.  Now we are capable of awakening to the individually thinking I, the human active intellect, in a way that brings it not only into the head, but into the heart, and connects earth with heaven in a Michaelic way. Although still feeling our connection to the whole world of nature and spirit, we grow beyond our old pantheism. The individual spirit is raised to full self-consciousness through the intuitive experience of the I AM, grasped through pure thinking as an inner perception. This happens in the moment of instant understanding of the contents of a thought that you created AND which is perceived as existing before the body, outside the body. There is a GIANT difference between representative image thinking, taking place within the skull, and intuitive self-conscious, spiritualized thinking that is observed at the same moment as my I AM, before the concept of inner and outer is formed. In addition, now the spiritual relationships between individual humans arise in fuller consciousness. Individual human spirits can now unite with each other in a free community, but indeed given their inspiration and power of freedom through the activity of the universal I AM of Christ - He who belongs to all nations. 



Monday, August 15, 2022

14 different types of syllogisms from Aristotle's Prior Analytics with concrete examples (Logic)

To understand the nature of Aristotle's logic, see the excellent article here: 

 https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-logic/


These are my notes and examples below. For the spiritual scientist it is important to see the logical connections in intuitive experience on the ideal or concept plane itself. Then, it can be spiritualized or shifted to the virtual with the good graces of the mother of Wisdom. I could not easily draw the 4 Venn diagrams here, but if you are interested or confused contact me. Some of this was worked through with my close colleague and friend, Jeremy Qvick. Enjoy! 


A = all or everything (affirmo – I assert X positively)

I = some IS

E = None IS (nego = I deny X)

O = Some is NOT


I and E convert = Iab = Iba etc


The predicate in the conclusion is the Major term. The subject in the conclusion is the Minor term.


Only 4 Venn diagram relationships fundamentally with shifts in variables.


_______First Figure________AB, BC, AC



1. Barbara – Aab, Abc, Aac = All Bs are As, All Cs are B, therefore All Cs are As.


Example – All rivers flow according to the influence of gravity, but all gravitational forces pull most strongly toward the center of the Earth, Therefore all rivers flow most strongly toward the center of the Earth. B river, A gravity, C center


Difference between basic rules of sentential logic, like modus ponens (If A then B, A therefore B) and these syllogistic rules of universality and partial coverage. This shows us why the Universal and Existential quantifier is helpful. Because Barbara only shows us universal connectivity of coverage and extension existing between concepts in the deductive chain, whereas modus ponens shows us that a judgment has been made that A actually exists, and therefore the connection to the other cause, effect, object, or genus of B must occur. For example, modus ponens requires the existence of rivers and the judgment that this X is a river.


2. Celarent – Eab, Abc, Eac = No B is A, All Cs are Bs; Therefore No C is A. [related to Cesare]


Example – 1. No bee is a mammal. (Eab = Eba) C milk B mammal A bee

2. All true milk is produced by mammals to feed their young.

3. No bee produces milk to feed its young. (Eac = Eca)



3. Darii – Aab, Ibc, Iac = All Bs are A, Some Cs are B, Therefore some Cs are A.


True example: 

All iron rusts

Some tools are made of iron

Therefore, some tools rust. 


A more controversial but also more realistic argument: 

A Grammar   B  S Language   C  French 


All second language learning should include some study of grammar

Some French is taught as a second language 

Therefore some French language study should include the study of grammar 


False Example – A cannibal, B carnivore, C pets

1. All carnivores are potential cannibals. 

2. Some pets are carnivores. 

3. Therefore, some pets are potential cannibals (or V.V.)

Can you tell why it does not work? 


4. Ferio – Generally analytic or based on definition and essence of concepts

Eab, Ibc, Oac = No B is A; Some Bs are C; Some C is not A.



Example X – A fruit, B spruce, C Tree


1. No Spruce produces fruit (because they produce cones)

2. Some trees are spruces (Ibc = Icb)

3. Therefore, some trees do not produce fruit


Example Y – B plant, A stone, C red flower


1. No stone is a plant (Eab = Eba)

2. Some plants develop red flowers

3. Some red flowers exist but not growing from stones


_____ 2nd figure_____ AB, AC, BC


5. Cesare – Eab, Aac, Ebc = No b is a, All c is a, no c is b


Venn = Identical to Celarent above, but variables shift. 


Example X (B tree, A underwater, C coral)

1. No trees grow completely underwater

2. All coral grows completely underwater

Therefore 3. No tree is coral. (Ebc = Ecb)


6. Camestres – Aab, Eac, Ebc = All B is A, No c is a, therefore no c is b.


Venn diagram – the same form as Celarent and Cesare, but variables shift.


Example X – B turtles, A shells, C nests in standing trees

1. All turtles have shells

2. No animal that builds a nest in a standing tree has a shell

therefore 3. No turtles build nests in standing trees


This is a good example of what Rudolf Steiner says about forming conclusions: we make the judgment of 3 first, and then we can work outward and backward to make connections to other genera (thus we can form the premises afterwards)



7. Festino – Eab, Iac, Obc = No b is a, some c is a, some c [minor] is not b [major]


Venn – same form as Ferio, but variables shift.


Example X – B carbon, A fluorine, C gas form


1. No Carbon is Fluorine (F is not C from Eab – Eba)

2. Some Fluorine is in gas form (Iac = Ica)

3. Some things in gas form are not Carbon.


8. Baroco – Aab, Oac, Obc


1. All b is a, some c is not a, some c is not b


Venn – same as Darii but now we are focused on the part of the circle that is outside A and B


Example X = A feathers, B bird-like, C Dinosaurs

1. All birdlike animals have feathers

2. Some Dinosaurs did not have feathers (yet this makes sense, because we know that some did)

3. Some Dinosaurs were not bird-like


Example Y = A flying, B bats, C mammals

1. All bats are flying animals (some flying animals are bats since Aab = Iba)

2. Some mammals do not fly

3. Some mammals are not bats


Example Z = A tree, B spruce, C needle bearing things, exception = cactus



-----Third Figure------------------AC, BC, AB


9. Darapti – Aac, Abc, Iab = All C is A, All C is B, some B is A


Venn – same as Darii and Baroco, but now focused on part of B that is A


Example X – C bird-like, A feathers, B Dinosaurs = compare to Baroco example X


1. All birdlike creatures have feathers

2. Some Dinosaurs were birdlike (Abc = Icb)

3. Some Dinosaurs had feathers


Also, flying, bats, mammals



10. Felapton – Eac, Abc, Oab

No c is a, All c is b, some b is not a


Venn – Celarent mutatis mutandis


C sound, A Silver, B amplitude


Example X – 1. Sound is not imprinted on Silver Nitrate film (like light reflections are in analogue photography)

2. All sound has amplitude or volume

3. Some things with amplitude are not imprinted on Silver Nitrate film


11. Disamis – Iac, Abc, Iab

Some C is A, All c is A, some B is A

Venn – same as Darii but mutatis mutandis


Example X – C tax, A infrastructure, B govt

1. Some taxation is healthy for the development and upkeep of infrastructure (roads, etc.)

2. All taxation arises from individuals and organizations who hand over a portion of their profit to governmental organizations.

3. Therefore, some governmental organization is healthy for the development of infrastructure.



12. Datisti – Aac, Ibc, Iab = Every C is A; Some Cs are B; Some Bs are A.


C = subject SINGERS A = Microphones B. Pianists


Example A– 1. All singers incline toward using microphones today.

2. Some singers are pianists, (note that Ibc = Icb, so that one could also say – some pianists are singers)

3. Therefore, some pianists incline toward using microphones today.


Example B – 1. Every person who wears a hat is a guitarist; some drummers wear hats; therefore some drummers are guitarists. But really the major premise is not true.


Once you think this through intuitively or in the pure warmth of the living plane of seen concepts, you can learn how the world mind sees the reality in a spiritual scientific sense. So, beyond the form of Datisti, we note the ahriminic inverted soul machine which exists in the piano; the ahrimanic temptation to use electrical amplification to destroy the spiritual nature of the human voice.



13. Bocardo – Oac, Abc, Oab = some C is not A, All c is B, Some B is not A.

Venn – I bet you can figure it out :-)


Example X – C, Ukrainian ppl, A, Russian interests, B NATO

1. Some of the Ukrainian people do not identify with (or support) Russian interests

2. All Ukrainian people are supported by the NATO countries

3. Therefore, some of the NATO countries do not identify with Russian interests


14. Ferison – Eac, Ibc, Oab

Example – C exercise, A easy, B fun

Venn – can you figure it out?


Play with Super-Ferison = To say something positively about the extent of B, one needs a 4th variable D


No C is A, All B is D, Some A is D, some C is D.

Eac, Adb, Ida, Idc = Super-Ferison


Ramifications: No Exercise is easy. Some exercise is Fun. Everything fun makes people happy. Some easy things make people happy. Some exercise makes people happy. Some fun things are easy. Therefore, fun things can be something else beside exercise. Some things that make people happy are not exercise. Etc.


_____________________


Notes on Fallacies from Prior Analytics 4 – If you universalize the minor premise, it can lead nowhere, and thus no deduction is possible.

Other fallacy – All guitarists wear hats, some drummers wear hats, therefore some drummers are guitarists – no!

Correct = Every person wearing a hat is a guitarist; Some drummers wear hats; therefore some drummers are guitarists – YES!


Other issues – Note that Eab, Ibc, Iac (not part of the 14) does not tell you the extent of C that is outside A and B, but only that the part of C that is B or A is not in the other.


Friday, July 15, 2022

The Correct Starting Point for the Philosophy of Arithmetic: the Pure Activity of Thinking Used to Combine Concepts

    

Photo by Jean-Pierre Dalbéra of 12th Century Mosaic in Palermo




   Enumeration requires collecting aspects of the world into groups. In order to approach the most fundamental activity of combining and collecting aspects of the world into groups, there must be an area in reality where such a combining activity can take place. There must also exist a power that can manipulate the contents of this area where combining takes place. Furthermore, if such a power and the contents of this area are to become conscious, an observing activity must also take place. This region is the world of concepts, the power that combines is thinking activity, and the observer who reflects on this combining activity and its contents is the self-conscious thinking activity of the I AM.


   In the still too influential Critique of Pure Reason of Kant, we read the following passage: 


"...We can represent nothing to ourselves as combined in the object without having previously combined it ourselves. And among all representations, the combination is the only one that cannot be given through objects, but rather can be achieved only from the subject itself, because it is an act of its spontaneity." Version B, paragraph 15. 


Husserl uses this passage in his Philosophy of Arithmetic to provide evidence from Kant to demonstrate that sets do not exist in sense perception but only in thinking activity.  According to Husserl, we do not see multiple objects in pure perception, but only combine them in thinking activity or what he calls categorial intuition. Husserl sees his ideas with more clarity and directness than Kant permits, but that is not the main issue here. 


Nevertheless, Kant has made some errors in his presentation, which however appropriate for his time period, must be corrected in our own time, and experienced through our own self-conscious thinking activity. The real situation is correctly stated as follows: 


       I can represent nothing to myself as combined in an object or a group of objects without the work of thinking activity, which has combined them in concepts before I have represented the combination to myself as a personal subject. This collecting or combining activity cannot be accomplished or given through the objects themselves, but is rather achieved only through the activity of pure thinking. In fact, the notion of object is never perceived in our sense experience as such, but is only separated into its own 'room' through thinking activity. This activity of pure thinking is the creator of the ideas of object and subject in the first place, as well as the idea of parts, subsets, or organized aspects of such objects. The will in thinking activity, led by the laws of universal, meaningful, logical, and harmonious organization, draws together groups of concepts into temporary sets according to their content, and then it stops thinking and temporarily freezes this particular organization (Aristotle indicates this for the first time in his "On the Indivisible Line"). Such a temporary stopping of thinking activity on a frozen organization of concepts is counting or enumeration. Such a organization of different ideas or groups of the same idea can be displayed in a particular mental picture for my personal subjectivity. For example, I can represent the idea of the number five as the quincunx arrangement of the game die in the way that is shown on the mosaic of the Palermo chapel in the photo above. 

    Because the sense of my own self arises through the fact that my personal subject remembers all of these particular representations that have arisen through thinking activity combined with perceptual grasping, I become conscious of myself. Then, this permanent element arising through perception and memory can be taken up into pure thinking activity, where a new Self-consciousness arises as the I of pure thinking. 


      Rudolf Steiner makes all of these issues crystal clear in his Philosophy of Freedom, Chapter 4: 


"It must, however, not be overlooked that only with the help of thinking am I able to determine myself as subject and contrast myself with objects. Therefore thinking must never be regarded as a merely subjective activity. Thinking lies beyond subject and object. It produces these two concepts just as it produces all others. When, therefore, I, as thinking subject, refer a concept to an object, we must not regard this reference as something purely subjective. It is not the subject that makes the reference, but thinking. The subject does not think because it is a subject; rather it appears to itself as subject because it can think. The activity exercised by man as a thinking being is thus not merely subjective. Rather is it something neither subjective nor objective, that transcends both these concepts. I ought never to say that my individual subject thinks, but much more that my individual subject lives by the grace of thinking. Thinking is thus an element which leads me out beyond myself and connects me with the objects. But at the same time it separates me from them, inasmuch as it sets me, as subject, over against them."